I was asked a question
in conversation recently, and I have to admit, it’s a tough one. It is also the
sort of thing that is hard to give an application, because it comes out of the
minutiae of the Old Testament Law. If you know this ministry, though, you know
my attitude. If it is in the Bible, it can be discussed and understanding can
be pursued. That is part of the “quest” in Quest Forums.
Human Sacrifice
So the question was,
what is the meaning of Leviticus 27:28, 29, which reads, “no devoted offering
that a man may devote to the Lord of all that he has, both man and beast, or
the field of his possession, shall be sold or redeemed; every devoted offering
is most holy to the Lord. No person under the ban, who may become doomed to
destruction among men, shall be redeemed, but shall surely be put to death.”
When you read that,
what does it seem to say? Does it perhaps suggest human sacrifice? Because it
did to me. I looked it up in every commentary I could get my hands on, but I
could not find an immediately satisfactory answer. Unfortunately, that means I
probably will not be able to give one, either. But I am going to try, in the
same spirit they all did.
That is an important
point. Every source I read said essentially the same thing, even though it does
not seem like the most obvious answer. Also, I agree with them even though I am
still a bit uncomfortable with breaking away from the apparent meaning. No one
is prepared to read this as a command for human sacrifice. Why not? Because
that would be out of keeping with the revealed character of God.
Seeing the Forest in
the Trees
This comes down to an
important principle of Biblical interpretation. The Bible should be viewed as a
whole. Often, evangelical Christians are accused of having too literal an
understanding of the Bible. Partly that is because critics refuse to consider
the possibility of the miraculous things the Bible describes, but it is also
partly because of an overly simplistic understanding of what we do. A
distinction needs to be made between a literal, and a literalistic
interpretation. A literalistic reading is divorced from context. It cannot
recognize literary conventions like metaphor or hyperbole, and it does not take
related passages into account. A literal reading is different. To read
literally is to understand the text as it was meant to be understood, and to
see its place in the larger context of all Scripture.
That is what we do with
Leviticus 27:28, 29. The literalistic reading says that God made allowance for
human sacrifice. The literal reading looks for more information elsewhere in
the Bible, and finds it. The pagan neighbors of the Israelites did conduct
human sacrifices. And what was God’s opinion of them? He called them
“abominations” (Deuteronomy
12:31; Deuteronomy
18:9–12). In fact, in Jeremiah
32:35, He said that it never came “into My mind that they should do this
abomination.” Humans condemning other humans to death in an effort to please
God is a concept foreign to His desire and disgusting to His mind.
This consistent and
repeated biblical truth is the lens through which our passage must be read, in
spite of the first-blush meaning we may have inferred. With that in mind, we
can go back and try to dig a little deeper in the confidence that a consistent
answer can be found.
Vocabulary Matters
One of the most
important things to do is to read these two verses in comparison with the rest
of Leviticus
27. If you go ahead and read it, you might think I am being obtuse. It
could seem, rather than opposing the idea of human sacrifice, the whole chapter
actually strengthens the case for it. That is because it is actually a list of
regulations for sacrifices given to God. But you have to look closely.
In all the verses
before v. 28, the verb used for something given to God is “dedicate.” It occurs
in vv. 14–19, 22, and 26. That word translates a Hebrew term meaning, “to make
holy.” Therefore, a dedicated thing was set apart to God’s use. That did not
necessarily mean it had to be destroyed. It could also be bought back with
money, or “redeemed.” In fact, dedicated humans had to be redeemed.
Importantly, a shift
occurs in v. 28. God’s commandment is no longer talking about dedicated things.
A distinction is made, set up with that first word “nevertheless.” So, the Lord
is saying, what has preceded will not apply to what follows. And what follows
is no longer a discussion of “dedication,” but of “devotion.” Devoted things
are sharply contrasted with the earlier sacrifices. In fact, “devote” might not
be the best translation of the Hebrew concept presented here, even though most
English translations use some form of it.
It might be clearer to
modern readers if it said “banned things” instead of "devoted offerings", because that is the more common
concept where it appears in the rest of Scripture. In other words, these things
were cursed. For one example, look at Joshua
6:21 in the New International Version (since the New King James Version I
usually cite inexplicably obscures the original meaning here). It is part of
the story of Jericho, and describes the outcome of the battle against God’s
enemies. Our word is once again translated “devoted,” but the meaning is much
clearer. The Canaanites in the city, and all their possessions, had been
condemned. They were to be utterly destroyed. That had been God’s command, and
the Israelites followed through on it (well, almost, but that’s another story).
They obeyed the commandment of Leviticus 27:28, 29.
The devoted things, the
banned things, the cursed things, could not be kept. That was the purpose of
this command. They, in their own way, were also holy. But not in their
usefulness. Instead, they were holy in the sense that they could belong to no
one but God, and were reserved for His judgment. There could be no commutation
of the death penalty. No one could buy his way out, and anyone who tried to
keep such livestock, land, booty, or convicts, would come under the same
condemnation for trying to preserve what God had commanded to be destroyed. So
the point was not human sacrifice. It was that no man could pay the price for
the crimes of another.
Beating the Ban
There is one exception,
however. Scripture makes it clear that not every person is to be executed, but
we are all under the condemnation of death for our sins. We cannot buy our way
out. We cannot do enough to earn forgiveness of the debt. We sin against an
eternal God, which earns eternal condemnation. No one else can give enough for
us to be freed, either. They have their own sins for which they must account.
But what if someone sinless and eternal were to sacrifice Himself? That would
then be acceptable. That would remove the ban we are under.
And that is precisely
what has happened. The Bible does contain one positively-mentioned human
sacrifice, under the most special of circumstances. Jesus Christ, God
incarnate, was able to offer Himself up to pay the redemption price of mankind.
No one handed Him over. Rather, He gave Himself to be condemned. It was
precisely because He did not deserve it that He was able to satisfy the justice
of the Father. And because Jesus took this on, rather than having it forced on
Him, it was glorious rather than abominable. “Christ has redeemed us from the
curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, ‘Cursed is
everyone who hangs on a tree’), that the blessing of Abraham might come upon
the Gentiles in Christ Jesus, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit
through faith” (Galatians
3:13, 14).
The Bible condemns
human sacrifice as the ancients practiced it because it could do no good. It
was only one fallen person trying to make another into a payment for his
faults. What Christ did is of a completely different nature, and gives us the
only possible way out from the ban we are under. So Leviticus 27:28, 29 is not
about God calling for human sacrifice. It is a reminder that there is no way to
escape punishment, except for the one He provided by taking that punishment on
Himself. When you consider how total that ban is otherwise, I hope it will
inspire you to accept what Jesus did for you. And if you have, be grateful.
Remember how much it cost.
Thanks for checking out the Quest Forums
blog! If you enjoyed this post, please consider following me here, on Twitter
(@Quest_Forums), or on Facebook (“Quest Forums”). Links are in the sidebar. I
am always looking for new questions and comments, so submit yours on any of
these sites or by emailing questforums.ask@gmail.com.
And please, spread the word! The share buttons below are
a great way to do that. I want to connect with as many people as possible, so
if you know anyone with questions about the Bible, send them my way.
No comments:
Post a Comment