This is the question being
brought to mind by Rob Bell, author and former mega-church pastor famous (or
infamous) for his unorthodox views about Christianity. And in this case, he is
speaking specifically about the approach of many churches to homosexuality.
Before I get into any
substantive discussion, let me begin by saying I am disappointed to have to be
writing about this topic again. Christians are often said to be obsessed with
homosexuality, particularly Christians who are steadfast about what is contained
in the Bible. Certainly, we do tend to talk about it a lot. On the other hand,
most of the talk is responsive. It is not as if we constantly bring it up out
of the clear blue sky. That is generally done by those who want to see the
church change to be more approving of homosexuality. So one question to ask
would be, whose obsession is it really?
Here
is the article that explains what Bell said, along with a video of the
interview in which he said it. When Oprah asked about when (not if) churches will
become more accepting of homosexuality, he said it would be soon. His thinking
is summed up in this single paragraph: “I think culture is already there and
the church will continue to be even more irrelevant when it quotes letters from
2,000 years ago as their best defense, when you have in front of you
flesh-and-blood people who are your brothers and sisters, and aunts and uncles,
and co-workers and neighbors, and they love each other and just want to go
through life with someone.”
Culture and the Church
There is a positive
aspect to what Bell has to say, and I do not want anyone to miss it. But first,
we need to deal with how misguided he is overall. In the first place is his
comment that culture has already come to the point of accepting homosexual
relationships. Is this true? Yes and no. Most people in Western cultures see no
reason to stand in the way of people engaging in homosexual relationships. Even
homosexual marriage is seeing a plurality of support, though its legal
existence has largely been due to judicial fiat. But this misses a number of
important points. For one, to have a “live and let live” attitude is not the
same as celebrating homosexuality. Second, there is close to an even split in
public opinion, and the will of the majority does not equate to truth
automatically, anyway. Next, the growing comfort with homosexuality in our
culture does not mean it is being smiled upon by all the peoples of the world.
Many nations are still aghast at the idea of it becoming a commonplace. And lastly,
there is the most important point as it relates to culture.
The church, the assembly
of those faithful to Jesus Christ, has never been meant to reflect the culture.
We are called to reflect the Lord. In John 17:14-16, Jesus prayed this to the
Father on behalf of His disciples: “I have given them Your word; and the world
has hated them because they are not of the world, just as I am not of the
world. I do not pray that You should take them out of the world, but that You
should keep them from the evil one. They are not of the world, just as I am not
of the world.” Related to this, Jesus also said to His disciples in Matthew
5:14, “You are the light of the world,” which coincides with when He said in
John 9:5, “I am the light of the world.” Taken together, this means that we are
to give the light of Christ, not the darkness of the cultures we find around
us. Christians are required to know the truths of the Lord and speak them no
matter what the people around us think of it. Rob Bell’s position on culture
sadly amounts to little more than adolescent thinking. He wants us to cave to
peer pressure.
History and Truth
The second point Bell
makes in his attempt to persuade churches to accept the cultural turn towards the
celebration of homosexuality is to disparage the Scriptures. You can really
hear it in his voice when you listen to the audio, but even when you read what
he said, it comes off as dismissive. This is dangerous territory for him to be
walking in.
Put aside for a moment
that he has criticized God’s Word (but don’t worry, we’ll get there). Bell is
trying to say that a musty, 2,000-year-old document is too cold and distant to
mean much to the living, moving people of today. He is essentially arguing that
the truth of a position is defined by its age, and the newer the better. This definition
of truth is fairly frightful, when you think about it. Truth would change every day, if this were so. But thankfully, the word and the idea actually mean something else. For a thing to be true,
it must reflect the world as it is. We have not found human nature to change.
Homosexuality was as much a recognized reality during the days of Nero as it is
now. So if what the letters of Paul had to say about it then was true, how is
it not true now just as a result of the passage of time?
And what kind of Pandora’s
Box does this open for us? Contrary to what some less biblical people tend to
think, homosexuality is not the sole focus of the New Testament. It also calls
other things sin, like theft, adultery, extortion, and slander (all found in 1
Corinthians 6:9, which is curiously only known for condemning homosexual
practice). It says that these things lead to judgment. It also says that
forgiveness is available, and that God loves everyone and wants us to find
freedom from our faults. Which of these other truths should we ignore because
they are in “letters from 2,000 years ago?” In that interview with Oprah, Bell
praises the virtue of fidelity. But that is an old idea, and our culture is
trying to shake its chains. By Bell’s logic, should the church not, as well?
I have to believe, based
on the evidence we have, Rob Bell does not believe in God. Certainly not a
personal God, the God of the Bible. If he did, he might take the warning of
Revelation 22:18, 19 seriously: “I testify to everyone who hears the words of
the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him
the plagues that are written in this book; and if anyone takes away from the
words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the Book
of Life, from the holy city, and from the things which are written in this
book.” This has long been understood to apply to the entire Bible as we now
have it. But even if we limit it to the Book of Revelation, Revelation 22:15
says the unrepentant sexually immoral will not enter heaven. Bell wants these words
stricken from the record (along with a lot of others). He can only do that
because he does not believe God has spoken. He is not worried about the
warning. In his disrespect, he is inviting disaster. I hope he repents and sees
the truth of Christ, for the sake of his soul.
What is Grace?
This could all sound a
bit judgmental, I suppose, so let’s end by turning back to the positive in what
Bell had to say. In another quote from the interview, apparently taken from his
new book, he says, “Grace is when you know you’re loved exactly as you are.”
This, again, is wrong. But it is close. Grace is not knowing you are loved
exactly as you are. It is knowing you are loved in spite of who you were. It is
God’s gift of forgiveness. And remember, forgiveness implies wrongdoing. We all
need forgiveness because we have done something wrong. Christ died on the cross
to accept the punishment we deserved, so that we do not have to experience it
ourselves. Bell does not understand what grace is because he does not know what
forgiveness is. And he does not know what forgiveness is because he wants to
avoid any recognition of sin. His philosophy is, in fact, entirely graceless.
Under it, people feel alone and unloved for no reason. They are perfect as they
are, but God put them here to suffer “just because.” That is really rather
terrifying. At least a concept of sin gives us a reason for suffering. It is
not as arbitrary as Bell’s universalism makes it.
I promised a positive,
though, and here it is. Somewhere in all of this, Bell is telling us that there
are hurting people out there. They are
our brothers and sisters; aunts and uncles; co-workers and neighbors. They all
want to know they are loved. And they are loved. So is Rob Bell. So am I. So
are you. God does love us. He died for the love of us. We can find that love,
but only if we do so selflessly. We need to relinquish our sin rather than
calling it a part of our personality and clinging to it rather than releasing it
to the Savior. And we must have a loving, kind attitude in what we say to those who are still
refusing to access the offer made by Jesus. We do need to accept and
celebrate them. Not their behavior, not their relationships, but they
themselves. When we speak to them, they must be able to sense our desire for
their good, and our hope for them. That can be very difficult, especially when
balanced with the need to confront errors. But it is absolutely necessary. Without
it, we will be guiding people toward destruction just as surely as Bell is. The only way the church becomes irrelevant is by losing the wherewithal to tell the truth as God has given it to us, and by refusing to show the love God has extended to us. Both are necessary. And both together make the church imperishable.
No comments:
Post a Comment