Quest Forums articles always concern
topics about which I am passionate, but they are rarely personal. This week’s
post is an exception. It was recently brought to my attention that an online
petition has been circulated to create “safe spaces” on the campus of my alma
mater, Saint Vincent College in Latrobe, PA. You can read the full petition here.
I would recommend reading the entirety of it for context, and because it is
quite brief. Also, you should never just take my word for it. I have a
considered opinion, and I do hope to help in informing yours. But it is always
possible that I have missed something or read too much into something else.
Ultimately, you must make up your own mind.
Safe Spaces
One immediate
impression I gained from reading the petition is that it is very cleverly worded.
With phrases like “affirm[ing] … our Catholic identity and Benedictine heritage”
and “pledg[ing] to each of you that we will resolutely uphold Saint Vincent
College as a place of hospitality and hope for all who enter,” it is made to
sound like little more than an extension of the college’s existing culture.
Furthermore, it is written in such a way that anyone who would dare criticize
or question the petition would seem monstrous. Be that as it may, I am going to
do it anyhow.
The giveaway is in the
final paragraph, in the phrase, “safe spaces.” In a stunning example of
Orwellian doublespeak, this construct obscures meaning and chills debate. Saying
that safe spaces must be created suggests that the college is currently unsafe.
That is why it is so difficult to criticize. To say there is anything wrong
with this initiative is to open yourself to charges of being bigoted, and
desiring to harm the psyches of others. Furthermore, the creation of safe
spaces would be prone to making the campus less safe rather than more so.
That is no mere claim.
It is already the reality. At campuses across the country, commentators like
Ben Shapiro and Milo Yiannopoulos (of whom I am not a fan, for the record) are
being uninvited, boycotted, protested, shouted down, and decreed against in the
name of “safe spaces.” And more often than not, it is the universities and
their professors themselves who guide these efforts. It sends a single,
unmistakable message: no challenges to postmodern Progressive orthodoxy
allowed.
And there, then, is the
irony. There is the lie. Safe spaces are only safe for those who already engage
in the proper groupthink (wow, two Orwell references in one article. Now that’s
unusual for me). Step out of line, and you must be destroyed for daring to have
a different opinion. “Safe spaces” are about making debate and disagreement
impossible.
Too Close to Home
I have been aware of
safe spaces for some time, of course. Most of us have. It is the current trend
in academia, as schools twist themselves in knots to be in compliance with the
new taboos of an increasingly-religious secular left. It may not yet be a
modern Inquisition, but it is taking a lot of its cues from a medieval
unwillingness to hear something new.
I never expected it to
hit so close to home, though. The Saint Vincent I knew, the one I hope survives
this effort to stifle free thinking, was already a safe space. It was safe in
the only way that mattered, because it was a place where you could have your
own opinion, where you could challenge and be challenged by ideas, and where
the freedom to disagree was sacrosanct. And as an evangelical Christian at a
Catholic school, and a conservative student with liberal professors, I had
plenty of occasion for disagreement. But I never felt unsafe.
In part, that was
because of the environment of the campus. But more so, it had to do with my own
fortitude. I was not so weak-minded that every new idea was like a wave
buffeting me into rocky shoals. I was blessed with an upbringing that stressed
having a firm foundation in faith, while also having the humility to hear
others out. I did not need to be protected.
Perhaps I was lucky.
But is it really helping those less fortunate than me to shield them from
reality? Or is it not better start late rather than never? If children are
being coddled in their homes, as they seem to be, then the colleges need to be
places where they are finally prepared for the real world. And in the real
world, they are going to hear things with which they will not agree. There will
be struggle. That is what makes you strong. If you have a college that provides
“safe space” rooms for students to watch soothing videos and squeeze stuffed
animals after hearing ideas contrary to their worldview, then they are not
helping them. They are infantilizing them.
The Need for Offense
Above all else,
however, the “safe space” initiative is troubling from my perspective as a
minister and a Christian. I have made no secret about my disagreements with
Catholicism, but I have also been transparent about areas of agreement. I
thought that one of them was our understanding of truth. Truth is exclusive, it
is divisive, and it is offensive. It is exclusive, because Jesus is the only “way,
the truth, and the life” (John
14:6). It is divisive, for as Jesus said, He did not come “to bring peace
on earth” (Matthew
10:34–39). And it is offensive because Jesus is “‘a stone of stumbling and
a rock of offense.’ They stumble, being disobedient to the word” (1
Peter 2:8). Christ’s word is light, but “men loved darkness rather than
light, because their deeds were evil. For everyone practicing evil hates the
light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed” (John
3:19, 20).
The Gospel message is
one that says there is something wrong with fallen humanity. It also offers a
solution. In fact, it offers the only solution. But it is still difficult to
hear that there is something wrong with us, and many people cannot stand to be
told. Does that mean we should not tell them? Should we be silent, fearing to
offend or to make them feel “marginalized, dismissed, maligned, and even
attacked”? God forbid! No, we must show them that they have marginalized
themselves, dismissed themselves from the presence of the Lord, maligned the
sacrifice of Christ, and attacked the only truth that saves them. Challenging
them is the only way to rescue them. It would be the epitome of hatred to
remain silent. Nothing could make them less safe. Should we be cruel in the way
we say these things? No. Or can we force them to accept this truth? No again.
But we should not hide our light under a bushel just because it hurts their
eyes.
The Best Approach
That is my perspective.
There are other issues at play, of course, issues of race and of politics that
can also be divisive. But stopping discussion is the absolute worst way to
handle them. And it is also the least free. Young people are going to hear
things they don’t like, at least as long as liberty lives in this land. They
need to grow up by listening, evaluating rationally, making a decision, and
then, if necessary, producing a counterargument that leans on more than
emotionalism. Professors should be teaching that approach, not making little
automatons that cannot process new information. They should not be teaching new
generations to eviscerate the principles found in the First Amendment. And if
they will not do what is right, then parents and alumni need to stop sending
money to their institutions.
I hope Saint Vincent
College will not give in to this ridiculous concept. I am disappointed so many
people have supported it. There are names on that petition I know, which I am
shocked to see. Hopefully they do not agree with this nonsense. The most credit
I can give them is that they were pressured into doing so by fear of
persecution, or they were not well enough informed to know what this petition
implies. I hope they can come to see greater wisdom. Other names are not so
surprising. More than likely, they were the ones creating trouble where it didn’t
exist in order to silence dissent. May they repent. But however it turns out, I
know one thing for certain. The safety that matters most is the safety to say
what you believe. I won’t be giving that up just because it makes people
uncomfortable. There is no right to freedom from offense.
Thanks for checking out the Quest Forums
blog! If you enjoyed this post, please consider following me here, on Twitter
(@Quest_Forums), or on Facebook (“Quest Forums”). Links are in the sidebar. I
am always looking for new questions and comments, so submit yours on any of
these sites or by emailing questforums.ask@gmail.com.
And please, spread the word! The share buttons below are
a great way to do that. I want to connect with as many people as possible, so
if you know anyone with questions about the Bible, send them my way.
No comments:
Post a Comment