This article is the
second part of a look into the Cosmological Argument (CA) for the existence of
God. In the last one we laid some groundwork and considered the lynchpin of the
argument, known as Contingency. This week, we will look at its other two major
components.
Causation
As a reminder, what we
learn from the first part of the CA is that there must be a Necessary Being.
Otherwise, nothing contingent could exist. With that established, we can move
on to the very closely related second C of Causation. The argument here is very
little different from that of Contingency. It just depends more on our
observations of the universe.
First Cause
Fortunately, it can be
put more simply. We observe that everything that begins to exist has a cause
outside of itself. Again, my parents are mine, humanity is theirs, the earth is
ours, the sun is its, and so on. Go back far enough, and you reach the
beginning of the universe. And the universe does have a beginning. Contingency
establishes that as a necessity, and it has also been scientifically observed.
So if everything that has a beginning has a cause outside itself, and the
universe has a beginning, then the universe must have a cause outside itself.
Philosophers refer to it as the First Cause.
The First Cause’s
Cause
The most common
objection to this part of the CA is to ask, what caused the First Cause? But
that really just misses the point. The First Cause is not observed to have a
beginning, so it does not require a cause. And that has already been shown
through Contingency. The First Cause would, by necessity, be the Necessary
Being. Therefore, it could never not exist. It must be uncaused. It must simply
be. Otherwise, you run into the impossible concept of infinite regress.
Limits of Modern
Cosmology
Also, this does show
the limits of modern cosmology. Astronomical study can only tell us about
things we can observe. The more we look into the stars, the more we can piece
together about the universe up to its beginning. But it is impossible to
empirically test or measure anything before that, because nothing physical
existed in nature until that point, and science can only observe the physical.
Therefore, whatever caused the universe is, by definition, supernatural. That just means it is more-than natural in this context,
and does not lead immediately to spiritual or religious implications. But it is
a necessity that nature’s cause be something beyond nature, and therefore
beyond the scope of the natural sciences. That is important to know, because in
our culture it is often heard that science can provide all the answers. The CA
shows that it cannot.
We know to this point,
then, that the universe is contingent and caused, and must therefore have been
preceded by a Necessary Being and a First Cause. But that does leave us with a
major question. Even if it is stipulated that something started the universe, does
it mean that the something is still governing the cosmos? To put it in more
theological terms, if there was a God, is He still alive and interested in
creation?
Continuation
Continuation is the
aspect of the CA designed to answer that question. And as with Causation, it is
an extension of Contingency. After all, the concept of the Necessary Being
gives us the solution to the first half of our problem. If it is necessary,
then it simply is. It is eternal.
Continuing Care
The second half is more
important, though. The First Cause was necessary to the beginning of the
universe, but that does not mean it had to remain at work. At least, not at
first glance. But by returning to the concept of dependency, we see that the
Creator is still productive.
Continuation recognizes
that not only did dependent things come into being, but they continue to be and
new things continue to be made. This aspect of continued dependent existence is
true of everything in the universe. It is therefore true of the universe. What
is an aspect of the very nature of every part is an aspect of the whole.
Transitive Nature
To spell that out, let
me use a common example. Consider a hardwood floor in which every piece is made
of oak. Even if every piece were given a different stain, and cut to a
different length and width, what would the floor be? It would still be oak (and
also ugly, but that is neither here nor there). Broadly shared qualities allow
for generalization. Just as it is reasonable to say that a floor made of all
oak pieces is oak, it is also reasonable to say a universe made of dependent
parts is dependent.
Right Now
So now, take that to a
more explicit statement. If every part of the universe is dependent right
now, then the entire universe is dependent right now. It continues
to exist because something continues to make it exist. What started it must
sustain it, or it expires. A fire goes out without fuel, or to put it another
way, a lighthouse needs a keeper. For the universe to go on existing, it must
have a Continual Source.
I am going to stop
there for now. In these two articles, we have formed a foundational conceptualization
of the CA. That will allow us to wrap up next week by going through some
conclusions that can be drawn, some others that cannot, and the implications
for our understanding of the universe’s beginning and its Creator.
Thanks for checking out the Quest Forums
blog! If you enjoyed this post, please consider following me here, on Twitter
(@Quest_Forums), or on Facebook (“Quest Forums”). Links are in the sidebar. I
am always looking for new questions and comments, so submit yours on any of
these sites or by emailing questforums.ask@gmail.com.
And please, spread the word! The share buttons below are
a great way to do that. I want to connect with as many people as possible, so
if you know anyone with questions about the Bible, send them my way.
No comments:
Post a Comment