Sometimes we avoid
difficult stories in the Bible, and that can be a problem. Now, it isn’t
always. There are occasions when they would just be a distraction, times when
people want to talk about an obscure passage because they do not want to face
the straightforward truths in different places. And other times, discussing
the esoteric is no more than a way to prove knowledge rather than
increasing wisdom.
I don’t want to do either of those things. Still, the difficult stories remain in the Bible. If we believe, as Paul tells us in 2 Timothy 3:16, that “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,” then we have to be able to have honest, open discussions about them. But the goal must be to stick to the point. What is the easiest way to understand what has been said? How does it help us know God? And how can it make us better? If we stick to answering those questions, we can work through the Bible in a way that is practical and consistent with its purposes.
David’s Census
With all that in mind,
I thought it might be a good idea to go over the Census of David. This is a
story that appears in 2
Samuel 24 and in 1
Chronicles 21. David was a king of ancient Israel who lived about 3000
years ago, and about 1000 years before the birth of Jesus.
King David is one of
the Bible’s central figures, but this particular story is not well known. In
it, David orders a census of all the fighting men in Israel. After it is
completed, however, God is displeased with David for conducting it. He promises
to punish Israel, but gives David the option to choose one of three possible
judgments. David chooses a three-day plague rather than extended periods of
either famine or warfare. He chose the plague not only because it was shortest,
but because it came directly from God and the Lord might perhaps relent. And
though the suffering was terrible, the Lord did in fact relent and spared
Israel from the worst of it.
We could ask many
questions about this story. And since this is, after all, a discussion
ministry, you are welcome to do so. Some possibilities come quickly to mind.
Why does 2 Samuel say God caused David to call the census, when 1 Chronicles
says it was Satan? Why did Joab, commander of David’s army, not include two of
the Israelite tribes in the census? Why did God offer David the option to “pick
his poison?” And why did God punish the people instead of David himself?
Those would all be good
questions, obviously. Feel free to discuss them or ask any others. But in this
article, I want to consider the biggie: Why was David wrong to hold the census?
David’s Crime
Many commentators think
it was a matter of pride, and that makes a certain amount of sense. David, a
warrior king, wanted to know how great an army he could call under his command.
He was placing his trust in himself, rather than in God, and it led to ruin.
A very few others say
that the sin was in conducting a census at all. I hate to say it, but honestly,
that makes no sense. There is an entire book of the Bible, the book of Numbers,
which takes its name from the fact that the Lord called for the “numbering” of
the people of Israel before they entered the Promised Land. God literally
commands a census there—twice (Numbers
1:2; 26:2).
Nor was that a special limited circumstance. In Exodus
30:11–16, God gave Moses a set of instructions for every census that was to
be performed.
In fact, I think the
Exodus criteria may give us best explanation of what went wrong for David. We
cannot be sure, of course. Since the Bible does not explain it outright, we are
relying on conjecture. However, it seems reasonable, so I am going to make the
leap.
The Census Tax
In Exodus 30, God told
Moses that whenever a census was conducted, each person over 20 was to pay a
tax as part of it. Everyone, regardless of rank and status, was to give a
half-shekel. Unfortunately, we don’t know exactly how much that would be worth
today. A shekel was a measure of weight for silver, but it is not known for
certain how much silver it was. Also, we do not know what the value of silver
was in ancient Israel. However, the best guesses I could find said a
half-shekel was probably around five dollars. Certainly, it was not burdensome.
Which is the important
point. This was not an offering, and it was not a sacrifice. The former is a
gift to God, while the latter was to ask His forgiveness for sin. In either
case, people were expected to give them according to their means. The census
tax was different. Everyone was expected to make the same contribution.
That would make it easy
to keep track, for one thing. If you wound up with $1,000,000, then it should
mean you counted 200,000 people. But more than that, it was about equality.
Every Israelite, no matter how rich or poor, was equally a citizen of Israel and
a child of God. Requiring the same amount from everyone put this in relief. They
all had the same value.
David’s Crime, Part 2
My opinion (and again,
it’s just conjecture), is that David did not require payment of the census tax.
It does at least make sense, since Exodus 30:12 says a plague would result if
the tax were not paid. But more than that, my guess is David paid it himself.
The money from the tax was meant to go to the service of God, and knowing
David, it is unlikely he would try to withhold what was due to the Lord.
Rather, he would have covered the cost, thinking he was doing something
generous. In reality, however, he would have been making a statement of
comparative worth. If he could pay for every Israelite, he was better than
every Israelite, and owned every Israelite.
I could be wrong, and I
readily admit it. It is just a thought. But it helps to give a reason. David
was punished for pride, but not the pride most people assume. It wasn’t about
the army he could command, but about how much more valuable he thought he was
than anyone else. Therefore, the judgment was designed to show David who really
owned the lives of his people (not that it was the sole reason for judgment, as
2 Samuel 24:1 makes clear). It is still a difficult subject, but this at least
helps make some sense of it.
And as I said at the
beginning, that is what we want to strive for. We have an interpretation that
fits the pieces from a few different places in the Bible, but without being
terribly convoluted. We get an insight into the thoughts of God and His command
to be respected as the true Lord, before whom all are equal and to whom all
belong. And therefore, we gain the possibility of application.
Lesson Learned
Every story of judgment
in the Bible is a cautionary tale. It is like those memes going around right
now. “This is David. David was the king of Israel. David conducted a census,
and it resulted in a plague. Don’t be like David.” Well, ok, then. I guess I
won’t count people? Maybe the United States shouldn’t hold the census every
decade? Of course not. There is a missing piece, which understanding the idea
of the census tax helps us to fill in. David’s sin was overestimating his own
value and underestimating the value of others.
That is the lesson.
That is what we need to avoid doing. All human life is equally precious to God,
and all of it is accountable to Him. None of us is truly better than another.
We need to remember that we are created equal. We all share the image of God (Genesis
1:26, 27). And we should never do anything to degrade anyone else.
It’s really about
judgment. Do people do bad things? Sure they do. We all do. And when they do,
it can be helpful to point it out. But hypocritical judgment comes in when we
point it out to be hurtful. Sometimes we don’t want to help someone be better.
We just want to feel better about ourselves. And when we do that, we are
basically saying we are worth more. That, I think, was David’s sin, and it
could not be farther from the mind of God. We shouldn’t puff ourselves up at
the expense of others. So yes, don’t be like David, but not because he had a
census. Don’t be like him in thinking you are greater than everyone else.
This begs consideration
of something else, too. According to my little interpretation here, David got
in trouble because he thought he could cover the cost for everyone else. He
couldn’t, but God can, and God did. That is what Christianity is all about.
When Jesus died, he wiped away the debt of every person. Great or small, rich
or poor, no matter what we have done, we are all equally far from God, and none
of us has enough to make it back to Him. But Jesus paid the price so we could
come near, so we can know we belong. He was the complete opposite of David in
this case. He knew exactly what He had, but He gave it all away so everyone who
believes in Him can share in His life. That’s love. That’s what we need, and
what we should strive to reflect once we have it.
So what do you think?
Do you get the same thing out of this story of David, or is there another
lesson to be learned here? Because there is a lesson to be learned, I can
guarantee that much. God does not say anything without a purpose. We just have
to listen carefully.
Thanks for checking out the Quest Forums
blog! If you enjoyed this post, please consider following me here, on Twitter
(@Quest_Forums), or on Facebook (“Quest Forums”). Links are in the sidebar. I
am always looking for new questions and comments, so submit yours on any of
these sites or by emailing questforums.ask@gmail.com.
And please, spread the word! The share buttons below are
a great way to do that. I want to connect with as many people as possible, so
if you know anyone with questions about the Bible, send them my way.
No comments:
Post a Comment