Christmastime is a
season of contrasts, is it not? It is a celebration of peace, surrounded by
hectic bustle. It is a time devoted to joy, but is so often accompanied by
feelings of depression. The purpose of the holiday is to commemorate the birth
of the Savior of the world, and yet more energy is devoted to service at the
altar of consumerism. It can be a real struggle to make sense of this time of
the year.
There is one further level of contrast, however, which is a source of some conflict. A reader asks, “How do you respond to people who insist Christmas is a pagan holiday?” Christmas is often compared with pagan festivals that once occurred near the same spot on the calendar. The motives vary. Some are deeply devoted Christians who want nothing to do with the idolatrous practices they see as infecting the festivities. A few are neo-pagans complaining about “cultural appropriation.” And there are also groups of atheists and agnostics who point to it as hypocrisy. But in each claim, the case is the same. So, are they right? Is Christmas really no more than a pagan holiday early Christians stole in order to undermine the religion of others?
The Time of Jesus’ Birth
Answering that question
would seem to depend on finding out precisely when Jesus Christ was born. There
are some interesting theories there. Having gone through a few of them, I am
left with little more clarity than I started with. I will include links to a
few of the more helpful articles at the bottom of this post, for those who want
to look further. However, allow me to briefly describe the best explanations
for and against a December birth for the Messiah.
Announcement of John’s Birth
Either way you go, the
real sticking point is the timing of the visit of the angel Gabriel to promise
the birth of John the Baptist to John’s father, the priest Zacharias. This episode
appears in Luke
1:5–25. The birth of John was miraculous and deserving of such announcement
because Zacharias and his wife, Elizabeth, were too old to have children.
John had a great
destiny as the prophet sent to prepare the way for the Messiah, and that
ministry began even before he was born. In Luke
1:26-38, Gabriel made another visit to announce another birth. This time,
it was to Mary to tell her she would give birth to Jesus even though she was a
virgin. In verses 36, 37, Gabriel tells her that Elizabeth is already six
months pregnant in spite of the fact that she was barren. If Elizabeth could
have a baby, then so could Mary, since “with God nothing will be impossible.”
The unborn John was the sign that Jesus was coming.
But it also offers our
only chance at a timeline. If we could find out when Zacharias served in the Temple,
then we could know about when John was conceived. Then, knowing that, we could
just add 15 months to get to the birth of Jesus.
Unfortunately, we
cannot be absolutely certain of when that was. Zacharias’ branch of the
priestly family would have served twice a year. We do know when those times
were, actually. One was in late May/early June, while the other was in late September/early
October. In the first case, Jesus would have been conceived around December and
born near September. In the second, Gabriel would have visited Mary in March
and Jesus was born in December.
Now, that’s
interesting, isn’t it? The December date actually is viable, as it turns out.
But still, it is not verifiable. Our best piece of evidence does not give
absolute proof one way or another.
Shepherds in the Fields
Some guesses are also
made from the next biggest piece of biblical detail. Luke
2:8–20 tells us that angels appeared to announce the birth of Jesus to “shepherds
living out in the fields, keeping watch over their flock by night.” Does that
tell us anything? Maybe, but again, it is used by both sides of the debate.
Some say it would have been too cold for shepherds to be out in the fields in
late December, so Jesus could not have been born then. On the other hand, the
defenders of Christmas say Decembers in Israel are not brutal enough to keep
anyone indoors. Besides that, they may not have had a choice.
December is the lamb-birthing
season. At that time of year, shepherds have to be near their sheep in order to
take care of the newborn lambs. Not only does this potentially explain why they
were in the fields late in the year, but it also fits with the purpose of
Christ’s coming, since He is “the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the
world” (John
1:29). Lambs were the Passover sacrifice, and Jesus was crucified for the
sins of mankind at Passover. There is therefore a certain poetry to His being born
at the same time of year as they were.
Again, though this
might lend credence to Christmas, it doesn’t prove it. The Bible itself does
not actually draw this parallel, so even if we go by it we are still only
guessing. A guess is all anyone can make. For what it is worth, church history
is on the side of December. There is evidence that we have celebrated Jesus’
birth then from almost the beginning. But that is really not worth much, after
all. Maybe they had it wrong, too.
The Purpose of Christmas
As interesting as all
of this is, then, none of it really answers the question. Is Christmas just a
pagan holiday dressed up in Christian imagery? Of course not! The question is
only asked because it focuses on the wrong details and assumes what cannot be
proven.
There are decent
grounds for and against saying Jesus was born in December, but they are
incidental. The real challenge is to the idea of commemorating the birth of
Jesus at all. So the real question is, did that happen? Yes? Then Christmas isn’t
a pagan holiday.
The reason we mark it
is far more important than the day. Matthew
1:23 tells us that Jesus is Immanuel, “God with us.” He came to us, to live
as one of us, to die as the sacrifice for our sins, and to rise to life again
to prove His deity beyond dispute and open the way for us to spend eternity
with God. Certainly that is worth celebrating!
Jesus may just have
been born in December. It is a position that can be defended, so if you feel
like you can only enjoy Christmas if it is accurate, hopefully the evidence
helps. That is why the early Christians picked the date, after all, and not
merely to compete with pagan festivals. I find it interesting, but it hardly
matters to me. Nor do any similarities to anything else. What matters is that
Jesus was born, and I am really, really happy about that. It is worth taking
the time to commemorate, and I see nothing wrong with doing so at the same time
of year we have always done it. It is at least as good as any other, if not
better, so long as we remember its true purpose. This holiday is ultimately
about acknowledging that only Jesus Christ is worth worshipping. Everything else
pales in contrast to Him. So celebrate the coming of the Light of the World
without any shadow of doubt.
--------------------
Further Reading:
Christmas–Was
Jesus Born on December 25th?
Thanks for checking out the Quest Forums
blog! If you enjoyed this post, please consider following me here, on Twitter
(@Quest_Forums), or on Facebook (“Quest Forums”). Links are in the sidebar. I
am always looking for new questions and comments, so submit yours on any of
these sites or by emailing questforums.ask@gmail.com.
And please, spread the word! The share buttons below are
a great way to do that. I want to connect with as many people as possible, so
if you know anyone with questions about the Bible, send them my way.
No comments:
Post a Comment